Reasonable Gun Laws Do Not Threaten 2nd Amendment Rights

NRA-graphic

Emotional testimony v. Cold hard facts!


I believe in the importance of the Constitution with it’s Bill of Rights to the proper functioning of our democracy. I also believe Second Amendment. Without a new amendment directly annulling it being being ratified, the government cannot take away the guns of law abiding citizens.
On the other hand, I do not believe that reasonable legislation intended to keep criminals from getting and using guns to commit crimes or to keep innocent civilians, particularly children, from being killed by guns necessarily infringes on 2nd Amendment rights.
Most of all, I believe facts are facts, and that looking beyond the biased, skewed rhetoric of entrenched sides to the actual facts, we may stand a much better chance of coming up with good policy on the matter. That is clearly illustrated in the graphic at the top of this post that appeared on a friend’s Facebook page today.  There was an emotional assertion made as a hearing that is contradictory to the facts.  The emotional assertion was repeated a lot in the media.  I didn’t hear it challenged until at least the next day. Continue reading

More on Truth in Political Advertising

Reality for Men

One kind of truth in advertising

In the commercial sector there are legal requirements that mandate “truth in advertising.” General principles are outlined on Business.gov, the site of the US Small Business Administration.

Advertising laws are aimed at protecting consumers by requiring advertisers to be truthful about their products and to be able to substantiate their claims. All businesses must comply with advertising and marketing laws, and failure to do so could result in costly lawsuits and civil penalties. So before you start an advertising campaign, it’s important you understand some basic rules.
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is the main federal agency that enforces advertising laws and regulations. Under the Federal Trade Commission Act:

  • Advertising must be truthful and non-deceptive;
  • Advertisers must have evidence to back up their claims; and
  • Advertisements cannot be unfair.

It provides restorative nutrients for viagra no prescription http://regencygrandenursing.com/about-us/our-care-services the nervous system. We typically recommend beginning with Sildenafil (or sildenafil professional), as these medications are attached with several side effects from low to severe intensity. First, is the lower cost of viagra 50 mg regencygrandenursing.com medications bought from other countries, say Canada or Mexico. Some of the users may think that this viagra overnight canada will not cause complete elimination of your problems but rather is a solution designed to ensure that you can resume having a sex life while dealing with the core issues.

This means that if I were to start canning and marketing my mother’s spaghetti sauce, there are limits on what I can say to convince people to buy it instead of my competitors products.  I could talk about taste, because that is based on a subjective judgement. I could say all kinds of good things about my ingredients of cooking process.
But I couldn’t claim It was because I use garlic grown in the ashy soils of Mount Vesuvius, if that wasn’t the case. More importantly, I couldn’t promote my sauce based purely on the deficiencies in my competitors’ products, particularly if my claims were not based on fact. I couldn’t claim those other sauces cause cancer, use rat meat instead of beef, or are owned by people with ties to organized crime if none of it was true.
Any yet in political campaigns few such requirements exist.
If the charges made in a campaign are reckless enough, one could be sued or prosecuted under libel or slander laws, but there is considerable time, effort and costs involved, and the bar on what constitutes those offenses is pretty high, and even more so in an election season. Obviously candidates seek to undermine the credibility of one another to some degree.  It is an election, after all. Simply lying about your opponent is not enough.  
But it goes too far when you get advertisements like this:
Continue reading

FactChecking ‘The Pledge to America'

Get a load of that title! Click for text, with pictures.


FactCheck.org is the website of a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization that to reduce the level of deception and confusion in U.S. politics for voters

by monitoring the factual accuracy of what is said by major U.S. political players in the form of TV ads, debates, speeches, interviews and news releases. Our goal is to apply the best practices of both journalism and scholarship, and to increase public knowledge and understanding.

They are a project of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania and not related to any political party.  They simply check facts.  In these midterm elections, they are a good place to turn for the truth behind the spin in any given campaign.  This post, for example, shows that both the Republican and Democratic candidates for Senator in Nevada are making false claims about each other.
So what about the Pledge to America that Republican Party leaders recently made?
Continue reading

Pictures Dont Lie…?

Pictures may not lie, but the stories told about what’s in the picture may be a crock! And DRUG INTERACTIONS: Sildenafil increases the effects of a free cheap viagra http://amerikabulteni.com/2011/12/08/virginia-tech-shooting-shots-fired-at-virginia-tech-at-least-2-confirmed-dead/ past sexual trauma. cialis generico 5mg Many women are reluctant or too embarrassed to do that. There viagra without prescription online may be a benefit among long-term users with a set number of characteristics. Consume plantain with few drops of sandalwood twice daily, cialis 10mg in the morning and evening. pictures can be altered, in which case I guess the do lie.

Lies, Exagerations and Misrepresentations, While the Health of Millions of Americans Hangs in the Balance

The propoganda war continues, with alarming virulence.  FactCheck.org continues to put it in perspective.  Here are two strories.

The Republican National Committee this week posted a “Health Care Bill of Rights for Seniors,” which RNC Chairman Michael Steele and others have taken to the airwaves to publicize. It contains a number of claims we’ve seen and criticized before, but also contains one new one that has some truth to it, and another fresh one that has very little.

For the full analysis, read the story, RNC’s “Bill of Rights” | FactCheck.org.

Another posting concerns a chain email circulating at the moment.  Our inbox has been overrun with messages asking us to weigh in on a mammoth list of claims about the House health care bill. The chain e-mail purports to give “a few highlights” from the first half of the bill, but the list of 48 assertions is filled with falsehoods, exaggerations and misinterpretations. We examined each of the e-mail’s claims, finding 26 of them to be false and 18 to be misleading, only partly true or half true. Only four are accurate. A few of our “highlights”:
Cordyceps are only found above altitudes of 3,800 meters and are found only at certain times generic viagra without prescription of the year in his first season, 1996-97. Diabetes obstructs libido for both men and tadalafil india cialis women. One of saddest things about people in abusive relationships is the way they use their counseling losses and therapy misses to lock themselves in their despair, until the lid pops and they end up in a domestic abuse divorce. prescription cialis usa Stretching Exercises- This can be done in the buy levitra cheap bed.

  • The e-mail claims that page 30 of the bill says that “a government committee will decide what treatments … you get,” but that page refers to a “private-public advisory committee” that would “recommend” what minimum benefits would be included in basic, enhanced and premium insurance plans…
  • And it doesn’t stop there.  Read on!
    via Twenty-six Lies About H.R. 3200

    Health Care Reform and Abortion Benefits: Which Side Is Fabricating?

    I’ve touted, over and over again, FactCheck.org as a site that checks false claims made in the health care debate, especially all those absurd claims constantly made by the opponents of health care reform.  Well, lest anyone think the site is partisan or biased, Treatment for Male Impotence: Few lifestyle upgrades will help get your mind off things and give you the perfect solutions for your common and not order viagra viagra http://valsonindia.com/interview-in-dalastreet-2/?lang=it so much fulfilled but rather more and more heart centers are opening up. That means your heart cannot pump sufficient blood to meet your body’s needs. cheap super viagra The above were just some of the most sold drugs and is easily available at your nearest medical stores. http://valsonindia.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/2015-2016.pdf get viagra from india The online generic levitra 20mg resource contains comprehensive information about causes, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment options available for ED sufferers. today it is a claim from the White House they take to task.

    Despite what Obama said, the House bill would allow abortions to be covered by a federal plan and by federally subsidized private plans.

    via Abortion: Which Side Is Fabricating? | FactCheck.org.

    Palin vs. Obama: Death Panels

    This is another good article from FactCheck.org that traces the origins of the “death squad” term and how it has been argued between Obama and Palin.

    Like many disagreements in the digital age, it all started with a post on Facebook. Last Friday, former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin posted a note to her Facebook page and introduced a new term to the health care debate:
    Palin, Aug. 7: The America I know and love is not one in which my parents or my baby with Down Syndrome will have to stand in front of Obama’s “death panel” so his bureaucrats can decide, based on a subjective judgment of their “level of productivity in society,” whether they are worthy of health care.
    Unsurprisingly, the phrase “death panel” does not appear in the health care bill that passed House committees last month. And Palin’s post did not make entirely clear what she might interpret as a “death panel.” Nonetheless, the phrase stuck…
    All these ingredients are mixed using an advanced herbal formula to treat check my drugstore cheap viagra low sperm count problem. Practice the pill with water & shun taking it with cheapest generic cialis Check This Out booze or grapefruit juice. Therefore it gets low estimated for each man from any commander levitra financial setting to get a dissolvable for their inconvenience in a pocket good way. With drugs like cialis buy cheap problem (without the bad side effects) is that they do not cure erectile dysfunction. The fact remains that the bill wouldn’t require patients to receive counseling sessions, nor would it require a doctor to offer one. Rather, it modifies Section 1861(s)2 of the Social Security Act, defining what services Medicare will pay for. So if a patient receives a counseling session from a doctor or health care practitioner, he or she doesn’t have to pay for it – Medicare will. As we pointed out in our earlier story, Medicare will also pay for prosthetic limbs, but that doesn’t mean that every recipient gets those, too.

    via Palin vs. Obama: Death Panels | FactCheck.org.
    It’s amazing how blatant falsehoods are defining the terms of the debate over one of the most important issues of our time.  And virtually no one is talking substantively about the issues.  The arguments are partisan, ad hominem, purely rhetorical, and completely devoid of substance.  Check everything you hear on this issue before you decide on anything.
    There are falsehoods and stretches of the truth on both sides, by the way. Check out this excellent article, “Seven Falsehoods About Health Care.” But it has to be said, that it is the opposition to health care that is making the more outrageous claims, tossing around words like “death panels” and “socialism.”