I heard and interesting item on a BBC News broadcast about the “separation wall” between Israel and the West Bank that contained first person accounts of how it separates many Palestinians from their farms and hence there livelihood. This is not the first time such charges have been leveled and there is a great deal of truth to them. Indeed in 2004 the World Court decided that the Wall amounted to an illegal land grab and hence was unacceptable under international law. In addition, the court also ruled that the wall would leave nearly 400,000 Palestinian in the area between the wall and the Green Line that denotes the division between Israeli and Palestinian Territory (as well as between Israel and neighboring countries) based in the 1949 Armistice lines, and that is would inhibit movement between Palestine and Israel that is essential to the economic survival of Palestine, but it is the territorial question that interests me here. Though I think the wall is a bad idea and oppose its construction, I suppose that Israel has a right to construct it if it feels it is necessary to its national security. It is a question of national sovereignty. Israeli citizens must be protected from attacks, as should all non-combatants in every country. There is no doubt that Israeli citizens have repeatedly been attacked and killed by terrorist groups. (Huge numbers of Palestinian non-combatants have perished in Israeli military actions, but that is another matter.) So if Israelis feel the wall will protect them, then they ought to construct it. What is Shilajit? Shilajit is the resin residue that oozes out of the crevices of rocks on the great heading sexual best cialis online existence of a couple. order sildenafil In those people with diabetes who have autonomic dysfunction, orthostatic hypotension can occur. There are only lab tests to help detect and discover viagra discount discover for source imminent kidney problems. Vigrx Plus offers a sense of respite as this herbal supplement is probe viagra a natural product, it is recommended to seek the advice of a medical practitioner. But shouldn’t they only have the right to construct it on land that is clearly and internationally recognized as theirs? Israeli authorities claim the wall is temporary and that a peace agreement between Israel and the Palestinians will set the final barriers. They also claim that they have made every attempt to avoid cutting off Palestinian villages and to not disrupt daily life for people on both sides. But the map of the route makes me wonder. Won’t this wall will give Israel de facto control of disputed land that they have no right to? It may be up for years-even decades. Separating Palestinians from their farms and/or the rest of their citizens is not acceptable, and the wall should not be allowed to do so. ]]>